*0010628442
*003NO-LaBS
*00520211116211607.0
*007t
*008140116s2013    xx     e          0deng d
*009     nam         1
*019  $bl
*020  $a9 781439 159699$c250 kr
*035  $a(NO-LaBS)10178836(bibid)
*041  $heng
*0827 $a781.64
*090  $c781.64$dMCM
*1001 $aMcMillian, John$_27076100
*24510$aBeatles vs. Stones$cJohn McMillian
*260  $aNew York$bSimon & Schuster$c2013
*300  $a304 s. ; [16] ill.$bill.
*336  $atekst$0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAContentType/1020$2rdaco
*337  $auformidlet$0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDAMediaType/1007$2rdamt
*338  $abind$0http://rdaregistry.info/termList/RDACarrierType/1049$2rdact
*5058 $aInnhold: Gentlemen or thugs? ; "Shit, that's the Beatles!" ; A particular form of snobbery ; Yankophilia ; Politics and imagecraft ; Wheel-dealing in the pop jungle
*5208 $aWith the sophistication of a historian, the storytelling skills of a journalist, and the passion of a fan, John McMillian explores the multifaceted relationship between the two greatest bands of our time. In the 1960s the two biggest bands in the world, the lovable Beatles and the bad-boy Rolling Stones waged an epic battle. The Beatles want to hold your hand, wrote Tom Wolfe, but the Stones want to burn down your town. Both groups liked to maintain that they weren't really rivals;that was just a media myth, they politely said;but on both sides of the Atlantic, they plainly competed for commercial success and aesthetic credibility. In Beatles vs. Stones, John McMillian gets to the truth behind the ultimate rock 'n' roll debate. McMillian reveals how music managers helped to construct the Beatles-Stones rivalry as they set out to engineer moneymaking empires.
*546  $aEngelsk tekst
*599  $a250 kr
*61024$aBeatles$_11964700
*61024$aRolling Stones$_13556700
*650 4$aBiografier$_10033200
*650 4$aMusikk$_10004000
*650 4$aMusikksosiologi$_12024300
*650 4$aRockemusikere$_18935200
*650 4$aRockgrupper$_11951200
*651 4$aEngland$_10120000
^